Insu

InsuComparePet insurance with dental cover

Comparison · May 2026

Pet insurance with dental cover included as core.

Four brands in our verified directory include dental illness in their base policy. Four others treat it as an optional add-on, restrict it to traumatic accidents, or exclude it from lower tiers entirely. The difference is roughly $300–$1,500 a year of unrecoverable cost for the average pet — yet most marketing pages don't make the distinction obvious.

Dental illness as core cover
4 brands
Dental illness as add-on or restricted
4 brands
Why this matters financially. Australian Veterinary Association fee benchmarks put a routine dental clean-and-polish around $300–$700 per visit (one or two per year is typical). A complex extraction with X-rays runs $1,200–$2,500. Periodontal disease treatment under general anaesthetic, with multiple extractions, can land at $1,800–$3,500. Most of those are billed as illness, not accident — so brands that exclude dental illness from base cover effectively exclude the most common dental claim type. The only consistent way to recover that cost is to either select a brand that includes dental illness in core, or pay extra for the add-on (typically $80–$300/year depending on brand).

Why dental cover is the most divided line in the AU pet insurance PDS

Pet insurers split dental cover into three categories that operate quite differently in the PDS. Reading the marketing copy, the differences are easy to miss; reading the PDS section-by-section, they're enormous.

Dental accident cover is the most common across all brands. If your pet breaks a tooth chasing a ball or chewing a stick, almost every base policy in our directory will cover the surgical extraction or repair. Even brands that exclude dental illness completely (PetsOnMe Accident plan, Petsy base) typically still cover dental from accidents.

Dental illness cover covers conditions that develop over time — periodontal disease, gingivitis, pulpitis, root abscess, oral tumours. This is the line that separates brands. Some include it in base cover (the four on the left of the split above). Others gate it behind the optional add-on tier or the highest-priced product tier (BWM, Coles, Petsy, PetsOnMe Deluxe). Dental illness is also where most claims actually happen in older pets.

Routine dental care — annual scale-and-polish without disease present — is almost always treated as a wellness item, not insurance. Brands that offer routine care add-ons (BWM, PIA, RSPCA, Knose, Coles) typically include some annual dental cleaning allowance in the wellness bundle. Petsy and PetsOnMe don't offer routine care add-ons at all.

Side by side — dental treatment in the eight reviewed brands

Feature Dental illness in core Dental accident Routine dental clean Sub-limit / cap
Pet Insurance Australia Yes (PDS Section 4) Yes (core) Routine Care opt-in benefit Per PDS sub-limit schedule
Knose Yes (sub-limited) Yes (core) Routine Care add-on Per PDS sub-limit schedule
Pet Circle Insurance Yes (sub-limited) Yes (core) Optional Extra Benefit Per PDS sub-limit schedule
RSPCA PetFlex Yes (PDS Section 4) Yes (core) Booster Care add-on Per PDS sub-limit schedule
Bow Wow Meow Booster Care add-on only Yes (core) Routine Care add-on Add-on sub-limit per PDS
Petsy Optional level of cover only Yes (core) Not offered Per add-on PDS
Coles Pet Insurance Ultimate tier + add-on only Yes (Ultimate) Routine Care Lite/Plus (Ultimate) Per add-on PDS
PetsOnMe Deluxe only · $500 cap Yes (Deluxe + Classic) Not offered $500/yr Deluxe (lowest)

"Sub-limit" means the per-condition cap that applies inside the headline annual benefit limit. A brand can show a $25,000 annual benefit while capping dental claims at $1,000–$2,500 inside that figure. The exact dental sub-limits aren't always front-and-centre in the marketing copy — they live deep in the PDS sub-limit schedule. We've flagged "per PDS sub-limit schedule" rather than guess at numbers that change with each PDS revision; check the most recent PDS before purchasing.

Brand by brand — the four that include dental illness

Pet Insurance Australia

Underwriter: PetSure (Australia) Pty Ltd · AFSL 420183 · Distributed by PIA · Insu Score 76 (highest in directory)

Dental illness
Core
Annual limit
$25k
Quote benchmark
$939/yr
Insu Score
76

PIA is the brand we'd point at first for dental cover. The bundled approach — dental, preventative, alternative therapies, and integrative items packaged together as Section 4 of the PDS — is friendlier than BWM's à-la-carte Booster Care system, which charges separately for each add-on. You pay for the bundle whether you use every component or not, but the price is built into the headline premium quoted at signup, not a surprise add-on later.

The PIA quote sample we have ($938.76/year for the $15k benchmark scenario) is the cheapest comparable quote in our directory and includes dental illness in the headline price. That's not a fair comparison against a BWM "+ Booster Care add-on" total — but at the base premium PIA is the cheapest brand offering dental in core, and the comparison is meaningful for buyers who'd otherwise pay BWM's add-on price.

Read full PIA review →

RSPCA PetFlex

Underwriter: Pacific International Insurance · AFSL 304370 · changed from PetSure 1 April 2026 · Insu Score 55 (partial)

Dental illness
Core
Annual limit
$35k
Reimburse %
60–90%
Insu Score
55

RSPCA PetFlex includes dental illness in its core PDS Section 4 alongside the rest of the cover. It also has the highest annual benefit limit of any reviewed brand ($35,000) and the most reimbursement options (60/70/80/90%), so dental claims have room to breathe inside the headline cap.

The asterisk worth knowing: PetFlex is the new product name following the underwriter change from PetSure to Pacific International on 1 April 2026. The dental cover provisions are written into the new PDS, but there's no claims track record under the new structure that's longer than a month. Existing RSPCA Pet Insurance customers transitioning across should re-read the PetFlex PDS to check that dental sub-limits and waiting periods haven't shifted.

Read full RSPCA review →

Knose

Underwriter: Pacific International Insurance · AFSL 304370 · Distributed by Knose Financial Services · Insu Score 49 (partial)

Dental illness
Core
Annual limit
$25k
Reviews
4.7 ★
Insu Score
49

Knose is the brand we'd recommend for buyers who want core dental cover paired with the strongest customer experience in the directory (4.7 stars across 692 reviews). The cover is technically a step below RSPCA on headline numbers ($25k vs $35k limit), but the customer-handling track record is materially better — and dental sub-limits inside the PDS appear to be in line with the Pacific International family standard.

Three reimbursement options (70/80/90%) give some control over the dental copayment exposure. The PDS sub-limits and waiting periods (typically 6 months for dental illness across the AU industry) are the items to read closely.

Read full Knose review →

Pet Circle Insurance

Underwriter: Pacific International Insurance · AFSL 304370 · Distributed by Knose Financial Services · Insu Score 50 (partial)

Dental illness
Core
Annual limit
$30k
Reviews
4.4 ★
Insu Score
50

Pet Circle Insurance is the same Pacific International product line as Knose, distributed by Knose Financial Services, but wrapped in the Pet Circle brand. The PDS dental provisions are functionally identical to Knose. The differentiator is the $5,000 higher annual benefit cap ($30k vs Knose's $25k) and the Pet Circle parent-brand familiarity for existing customers.

Caveat that applies to all Pet Circle reviews: the 4.4-star average mixes feedback on the e-commerce experience with feedback on the insurance claims experience, since both share the brand name. The Pacific International claims-handling itself is the same Knose customers experience.

Read full Pet Circle review →

Brand by brand — the four where dental is gated

Bow Wow Meow — Booster Care add-on

Underwriter: PetSure · AFSL 420183 · changed from Hollard 14 June 2023 · Insu Score 74

BWM's Nose-to-Tail Cover is comprehensive on accidents and illnesses but explicitly excludes dental illness from base — it's available only via the Booster Care add-on, alongside behavioural and alternative therapies. Each add-on carries its own annual sub-limit and its own additional premium, so a buyer who wants dental cover ends up at a higher headline cost than a brand that bundles it (PIA at $939/year compares against BWM at $949/year base + ~$80–150/year Booster Care add-on).

The structural difference matters: BWM's add-ons let you decline what you don't need. If you're confident your pet won't develop dental issues (small dogs typically don't until 5+; cats from 3+), the BWM model lets you skip dental and pay less. Bundled brands charge for it whether you use it or not.

Read full BWM review →

Petsy — optional level of cover

Underwriter: Allied World Assurance (AU branch) · Insu Score 49 · ProductReview rating 4.9★

Petsy's standard policy excludes Dental Illness — buyers wanting dental cover have to select the optional dental level of cover at signup, which carries a higher base premium. Petsy doesn't offer separately-priced add-ons in the BWM Booster Care style; the dental option is built into a different policy tier.

Petsy's strength is customer satisfaction (the highest in our directory at 4.9★ across 309 reviews). If dental cover isn't a priority, the lean base product and the satisfaction track record are the reasons to consider it. If dental is a priority, the Pacific International family or PIA are stronger value at the same total premium.

Read full Petsy review →

Coles Pet Insurance — Ultimate tier only

Underwriter: Guild Insurance · AFSL 233791 · Insu Score 48 (partial) · ProductReview rating 2.2★

Coles offers five product tiers — Basic ($7k), Essential ($10k), Comprehensive ($12k), Premium ($25k), Ultimate ($40k). Dental cover is gated to the Ultimate tier and even there it's an optional add-on rather than core inclusion. To get dental at Coles you're paying both the highest tier premium and the dental add-on premium — likely the most expensive total in our directory once both sit on top.

The 2.2-star ProductReview average across 40 reviews is the lowest in our directory by some margin. Combine that with the gated dental access, and Coles is hard to recommend to buyers whose primary need is dental cover. The other Coles strengths (highest theoretical headline cover at $40k Ultimate, 100% reimbursement option) are real, but they don't address the dental-priority use case.

Read full Coles review →

PetsOnMe — Deluxe tier, $500 sub-limit

Underwriter: Pacific International Insurance · AFSL 304370 · Insu Score 41 (lowest in directory)

PetsOnMe is the most restrictive in our directory on dental. The lower two tiers (Accident $5k, Classic $10k) cover only dental injury from a traumatic accident — chewing-related fractures qualify, periodontal disease doesn't. The top Deluxe $20k tier adds dental illness cover but caps it at $500 per year after a 180-day waiting period, which is unusually long compared to the 6-month industry standard.

The $500 cap is also low enough that a single complex extraction with X-rays can exhaust the dental sub-limit in one visit. PetsOnMe also doesn't offer a routine care add-on, so annual dental cleans are out-of-pocket regardless of tier.

Read full PetsOnMe review →

Which one should you actually buy?

If dental is your single most important coverage line: Pet Insurance Australia

Bundled dental cover, cheapest comparable quote in our directory ($939/year at the $15k benchmark), strong PetSure-administered claims process, 4.4★ across 2,246 reviews. The single-tier reimbursement structure (80% only) is a downside if you want flexibility, but on dental coverage and value it's the strongest pick.

If you want dental + the highest cap available with included dental: RSPCA PetFlex

$35k annual benefit, four reimbursement options, dental illness in core. The post-1-April-2026 underwriter change is a real caveat — if you need an established track record under the new structure, wait three to six months. If you don't, this is the most cover-per-claim setup in the directory that still includes dental as standard.

If you want core dental + the strongest customer experience: Knose

4.7★ across 692 reviews is the highest customer satisfaction in our directory among brands with substantive review volume. Dental in core, three reimbursement options, mid-pack annual cap ($25k). The right pick if you want included dental and you'd rather pay slightly less for the cover and slightly more attention to the claims experience.

If you specifically want BWM but accept the add-on cost: Bow Wow Meow + Booster Care

BWM has the longest customer-satisfaction track record in the AU market (9 consecutive years ProductReview Top Rated). The Booster Care add-on lets you turn dental cover on, with a separate sub-limit and additional premium. Total cost lands roughly $1,030–$1,100/year — more than PIA bundled, but you're buying BWM's brand maturity in addition to dental cover.

What's not in this comparison

This page covers the eight reviewed brands in our verified AU pet insurance directory. The remaining 11 brands (Bupa, Medibank, HCF, Buddy, Woolworths, Petplan/Petcover, Australian Seniors, Kogan, Guardian, Fetch, Budget Direct) will appear here once we audit their current PDSs. Most PetSure-administered brands (Bupa, Medibank, HCF, Buddy, Woolworths) sit on similar product chassis to BWM and PIA, so we'd expect their dental cover treatment to broadly track those. Pacific International brands (Fetch) likely follow the Knose / Pet Circle model. The PetSure and Pacific International family pages are useful starting context.

This page also doesn't model total annual dental spend — that depends on breed, age, and the specific dental conditions your pet develops. The AVA fee benchmarks above are typical-case figures; complex cases involving root canal, oral surgery, or repeated extractions can run materially higher.

How we sourced this

Dental cover treatment was extracted from each brand's current Product Disclosure Statement during the brand audit (PDS read dates per each brand review). Whether dental illness sits in core cover or behind an add-on / tier gate is taken directly from the PDS Coverage section; we don't rely on marketing-page summaries. Sub-limit specifics aren't fully tabulated above — they vary across PDS revisions and are best read from the most recent PDS at purchase time.

The Insu Score column reflects each brand's full Insu Score (current methodology v1.1) — the same score they receive on their individual review pages and in our headline ranking. Coverage features come from PDS audits. Review numbers come from ProductReview.com.au. Underwriter relationships and AFSL numbers come from APRA registers and ASIC AFSL searches.

Insu may earn affiliate commission on links to insurers — full disclosure on the About page. The brands above are listed by dental-treatment characteristics only; the order and selection are not influenced by any commercial relationship. The Insu Score is calculated identically for affiliate and non-affiliate brands.

This article doesn't constitute personal financial advice and isn't a recommendation about any particular pet insurance product. It is general information based on publicly available data and our published methodology. Dental cover provisions, sub-limits, waiting periods, and exclusions change between PDS revisions — always read the current Product Disclosure Statement before purchasing. Published 1 May 2026.